Redacted information of eyewitness update#
Redacted information of eyewitness series#

The previous recommendation was only to get a confidence statement after a positive identification. For example, the authors now advise that a confidence statement be captured whether or not the witness identified the suspect in the lineup. The original four recommendations were slightly modified for clarity and expanded upon when appropriate.

Record the entire process on video, from the instructions given to the witness before the lineup to the confidence statement from the witness after the lineup is complete.

Avoid repetition of a lineup with the same suspect and same eyewitness.

Use a lineup with several people instead of what is known as a showup only featuring a single suspect.

Ensure that police put in writing why a suspect is believed to be guilty of a specific crime before placing him or her in a lineup.

Advise law enforcement personnel to interview witnesses as soon as possible after a crime has been committed and record it on video.

Redacted information of eyewitness update#

This 2020 update adds five more that cover the time before a suspect lineup takes place as well as cautions regarding the use of showups. The American Psychology-Law Society published four original recommendations for eyewitness identification procedures in 1998 focused mostly on how suspect lineups were conducted. The division’s recommendations were published in the journal Law and Human Behavior ®. Given that it is still heavily relied upon today because DNA and other forms of definitive evidence remain extremely rare in criminal cases, improving the reliability of eyewitness identification evidence is an important priority to prevent miscarriages of justice.” “In fact, more than 70% of all DNA exoneration cases involved mistaken eyewitness identification. Wells, PhD, of Iowa State University, lead author of the recommendations. “Over the past few decades, serious concerns have been raised about the potential unreliability of eyewitness identification in criminal cases,” said Gary L.

Redacted information of eyewitness series#

This says that no State can make or enforce laws that restrict the privilege or immunities of citizens of the U.S.WASHINGTON - Law enforcement officials can reduce mistakes by eyewitnesses to crimes if they follow a series of recommendations that include interviewing witnesses as soon as possible after a crime and videotaping the session, according to the American Psychology-Law Society, a division of the American Psychological Association. Kraemer, where it was determined in a unanimous decision that the enforcement of racially restrictive covenants in the state court violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. It effectively deprived people of color of achieving home ownership in certain areas.Ĭases from Missouri and Michigan were appealed all the way to the U.S. In the U.S., residential segregation was enforced and maintained throughout the country, including in Fresno County, through government policies and enforced private agreements. This bill requires each county recorder’s office to establish a program that proactively identifies, catalogs and redacts any unlawfully discriminatory restrictive covenants (or agreements) in the county’s property records. ( KSEE/KGPE) – Fresno County Assessor-Recorder Paul Dictos released a statement imploring the Fresno County Board of Supervisors to adopt a California bill that removes racial discriminating language from county private agreements.Īt the end of 2021, California Assembly Bill 1466 was signed into law and went into effect on July 1, 2022.